Miami Herald writes:
No matter how many anti-spam programs you use, spam is going to slip through. And the question of whether to delete or open each e-mail comes down to a few words -- the contents of the subject line.
Read more...
PCWorld writes:
Three of the world's leading e-mail providers have joined together to announce their intentions to reduce the amount of spam faced by e-mail users, much of which comes from e-mail addresses set up through participating companies America Online, Microsoft, and Yahoo.
Read more...
Presstelegram.com writes:
New technology makes senders prove they are human, but many fear that will cause more problems than it solves.
Read more...
The Register writes:
Are spammers deliberately getting mail servers to bounce undeliverable messages towards their targets as a way of getting their junk read?
Read more...
News.com writes:
The findings of a new study will disturb but probably not surprise parents of young Net users: Spam is miring kids' online experience with smut and scams.
Read more...
Eweek.com writes:
Everyone's up in arms about spam. The government wants to legislate it, software vendors want to control it, and corporate IT managers just want to eradicate it. But the fight against spam has had some unintended consequences you just might not have thought about. Here are four spam problems to consider as you attempt to wipe it out.
Rean more...
Wired.com writes:
Listening to the Federal Trade Commission, one easily can get the impression that deceptive e-mail is downright un-American, since so much of it comes from places like Nigeria, Canada and Russia.
That's why the top consumer watchdog agency is asking Congress for expanded power to pursue foreign spammers, among other requests.
Read more...
ABC Online, Australia writes:
Computer experts and politicians are meeting in Canberra this week to discuss ways to curb growing number of unwanted emails, or spam.
Read more...
Bostonherald.com writes:
Increasingly sophisticated spammers are beginning to overwhelm e-mail, threatening to make it far less useful as a way to communicate. Even direct marketers - those companies that send us junk e-mail and ``snail mail'' - agree that spam is out of hand.
Read more...
The Sydney Morning Herald writes:
Late last year Paul Graham wrote "A Plan For Spam", setting out with extraordinary clarity why well-implemented Bayesian filtering should work better than other methods. After Graham pointed the way, new Bayesian filtering implementations appeared within a few weeks and dozens are now available.
Read more...
The Globe and Mail, Canada reports:
Spam pesters everyone with Internet access, because spam artists are so smart and cyberspace is so, well, endless. They call the Internet a liberating and democratic technology, and it is, but this kind of democracy now knows few limits, including spam.
Read more...
links
internet-101.com
Spam Bully
Paul Graham
archives
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2002
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2003
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2003
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2003
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2003
01 May - 31 May 2003
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2003
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2003
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2003
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2003
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2003
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2003
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2003
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2004
01 Feb - 29 Feb 2004
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2004
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2004
01 May - 31 May 2004
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2004
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2004
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2004
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2004
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2004
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2004
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2004
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2005
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2005